Go Back   Alberta Outdoors Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-2023, 10:24 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default 22 Creedmoor

Are any of you shooting a 22 Creedmoor? I am interested in your thoughts. What are your likes and dislikes with the cartridge.
I am interested in what type of brass your using, and powder and bullet
combinations.

I am also interested in the twist rate of your barrel and the weight of bullets you shoot.

Last edited by markg; 07-08-2023 at 10:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2023, 06:17 PM
Ackleyman Ackleyman is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Strathmore
Posts: 1,671
Default

A guy I shoot with now and then bought a Fierce Rival chambered in 22 creeed
I believe Peterson and Alpha brass were not available so he ran the 6mm thru FL die and loaded. He has a load now of 41.8 H4831 SC . Probably some better powders but he used what he could get. His is an 8 twist and he has been killing lots of coyotes around feed lot with 75 gr ELDM...not really a hunting bullet but hit a dog in the melon with one and there done. He really likes the rifle and caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2023, 11:21 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Found this if it helps anyone thinking of a 22 Creed

Found this little bit of info from Petersen about the 22 Creed. Hope you guys find it helpful.

As of now the following companies make brass

Alpha Munitions
Petersen
ADG
Hornady
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 22-creedmoor-load data.pdf (320.7 KB, 63 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-14-2023, 07:34 AM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,982
Default

Interesting cartridge but what would be the advantage over a 22-250 with a 1 in 8 or 7" twist, velocities seem to be really close for both
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-14-2023, 07:49 AM
obsessed1 obsessed1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,995
Default

22-250 is handycapped by a short neck when holding those super long bullets. The creed was designed for those long heavys from the get go. Thats about it practically speaking.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-14-2023, 08:49 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Pretty much

Quote:
Originally Posted by obsessed1 View Post
22-250 is handycapped by a short neck when holding those super long bullets. The creed was designed for those long heavys from the get go. Thats about it practically speaking.
Pretty much. The only place it has the advantage over the 22-250 is the heavy bullets over the 70gr mark.I do wonder if barrel life would be better due to the steeper shoulder as well, but I havent found any data on that yet.

Being a huge 6.5MM fanboy I was surprised to see that at ranges 600m and closer it has less drop and wind than the 6.5x47 and 6.5 Creed. Didnt see any data on the PRC or Sweede but my guess is those outperform the .22

I will admit I am getting a .22 Creed Barrel chambered for my the new rifle I ordered. (yes i took the proceeds from the sale of my 6.5 PRC for this project).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-14-2023, 09:41 PM
3blade's Avatar
3blade 3blade is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg View Post
Pretty much. The only place it has the advantage over the 22-250 is the heavy bullets over the 70gr mark.I do wonder if barrel life would be better due to the steeper shoulder as well, but I havent found any data on that yet.

Being a huge 6.5MM fanboy I was surprised to see that at ranges 600m and closer it has less drop and wind than the 6.5x47 and 6.5 Creed. Didnt see any data on the PRC or Sweede but my guess is those outperform the .22

I will admit I am getting a .22 Creed Barrel chambered for my the new rifle I ordered. (yes i took the proceeds from the sale of my 6.5 PRC for this project).
Closer comparison would be the swift, but creed has more capacity there as well and brass life is supposedly better with the creed. I don’t think shoulder angle is gonna help barrel life much when burning extra powder, probably a wash. I looked into one when sask legalized the 22 for big game, never got around to it.

Cool project though, what’s the end use?
__________________
“Nothing is more persistent than a liberal with a dumb idea” - Ebrand
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-14-2023, 11:37 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3blade View Post
Closer comparison would be the swift, but creed has more capacity there as well and brass life is supposedly better with the creed. I don’t think shoulder angle is gonna help barrel life much when burning extra powder, probably a wash. I looked into one when sask legalized the 22 for big game, never got around to it.

Cool project though, what’s the end use?
Gophers targets maybe some Yotes
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-15-2023, 05:31 AM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg View Post
Gophers targets maybe some Yotes
Let us know when you get it tuned in, I'm cruising for something to replace my 223 which is getting mundane it certainly looks interesting
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-15-2023, 11:41 PM
FishOutOfWater FishOutOfWater is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 1,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waldedw View Post
Let us know when you get it tuned in, I'm cruising for something to replace my 223 which is getting mundane it certainly looks interesting
I had the same thoughts, 22 CM and 22 Nosler seem like the way to go for long range varmints.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-20-2023, 04:29 PM
ranchhand ranchhand is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 127
Default

The 22 Creedmoor cartridge feeds better from the mag then the tapered 22-250 Rem case? I'm just guessing.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-20-2023, 04:34 PM
ranchhand ranchhand is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 127
Default

The 22 Creedmoor "standard" reamer that Manson makes has .080" freebore.
That would be the freebore for the 69gr to 80gr projectiles.

I'm thinking of a shorter freebore and slower twist to go old school. Basically a Swift then. Send 50gr to 60gr bullets fast.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-03-2023, 07:21 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default 22 Creed is now SAAMI approved

The 22 Creed is now SAAMI approved. Should see factory ammo soon.

https://youtu.be/kOHJQ_bpSwg
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-15-2023, 04:32 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Ran the Ballistics Data

So I was curious how some cartridges matched up. I was shocked at the results. Ran the Data on the applied ballistics app.

6.5 Creed with a 140gr ELDM @2750 = 9.5 Mil / 1000m

7mm SAW with 162gr ELDM @ 2900 = 8.1 Mil / 1000m

22 Creed 75gr ELDM @ 3380 = 6.8 Mil / 1000m

I found this really surprising.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-15-2023, 09:51 PM
6.5 shooter's Avatar
6.5 shooter 6.5 shooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg View Post
So I was curious how some cartridges matched up. I was shocked at the results. Ran the Data on the applied ballistics app.

6.5 Creed with a 140gr ELDM @2750 = 9.5 Mil / 1000m

7mm SAW with 162gr ELDM @ 2900 = 8.1 Mil / 1000m

22 Creed 75gr ELDM @ 3380 = 6.8 Mil / 1000m

I found this really surprising.
I just thought I would just include this for SAG

6mm 110gr A tip 3300fps = 5.7mils @1000 m
6mm 110gr. A Tip 3000fps = 7.2 mills

I would be much more concerned about wind drift personally.
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-15-2023, 10:38 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Impressive

That is impressive! I'm sure the wind call on that is pretty shooter friendly too!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-16-2023, 05:02 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Went back and looked

I went back and looked at the numbers again. Looks like it was the worst for wind drift. Makes sense as it has the lowest BC. Velocity is great but your right on your comment on wind. Gravity is constant so for all practical purposes the wind variable is the most important one in that situation.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-16-2023, 05:10 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Some results

Quote:
Originally Posted by waldedw View Post
Let us know when you get it tuned in, I'm cruising for something to replace my 223 which is getting mundane it certainly looks interesting
I've put 100 rounds down the pipe. I dont think its quite broken in yet as I havent seen a change in velocity. Did 50 rounds 75gr ELDM and 50 rounds 69 SMK's

It didnt like the smks and they didnt group less than an inch. It really liked the 75gr ELDM's and I had a few 1/2 moa 5 shot groups. Velocity was a bit low but Its a lighter load for break in (38.0gr H4350 and got just under 3200 fps) . So far I see great potential in it. I was also able to shoot 2MOA targets at 500m consistenly so thats good news considering the barrel needs more break in. From what I have seen on line I should expect between 3350 and 3400 fps with the 75gr.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-16-2023, 06:54 PM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waldedw View Post
Interesting cartridge but what would be the advantage over a 22-250 with a 1 in 8 or 7" twist, velocities seem to be really close for both
I have always disliked the body taper of the 22-250. It hinders single round feeding and contributes to case stretch. The case has been around since 1915. It is much improved by Mr. Ackley’s version. The Creedmoor has modern case design accuracy,will at least equal the 22-250 velocities, and handle long heavy bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-17-2023, 08:13 AM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,982
Default Looks Good

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg View Post
I've put 100 rounds down the pipe. I dont think its quite broken in yet as I havent seen a change in velocity. Did 50 rounds 75gr ELDM and 50 rounds 69 SMK's

It didnt like the smks and they didnt group less than an inch. It really liked the 75gr ELDM's and I had a few 1/2 moa 5 shot groups. Velocity was a bit low but Its a lighter load for break in (38.0gr H4350 and got just under 3200 fps) . So far I see great potential in it. I was also able to shoot 2MOA targets at 500m consistenly so thats good news considering the barrel needs more break in. From what I have seen on line I should expect between 3350 and 3400 fps with the 75gr.
Thanks Mark, seems you may have found a winner, early results look good, now my interest is really peaked keep us posted how things go on the next range session
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-23-2023, 01:20 AM
attk11 attk11 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3blade View Post
Closer comparison would be the swift, but creed has more capacity there as well and brass life is supposedly better with the creed. I don’t think shoulder angle is gonna help barrel life much when burning extra powder, probably a wash. I looked into one when sask legalized the 22 for big game, never got around to it.

Cool project though, what’s the end use?
This guy is taking bucks with them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaDI9W_5rKg
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-23-2023, 08:44 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 39,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by obsessed1 View Post
22-250 is handycapped by a short neck when holding those super long bullets. The creed was designed for those long heavys from the get go. Thats about it practically speaking.
This sounds like a very interesting little cartridge.

I really don't think that the longer neck is that much of an advantage. If that was the case, the Swift would have kept the 22/250 at bay.
The swift has a longer neck than the Creedmoor by a fair bit as well.

When the 300 magnum came out, it was perceived that the short neck would be its death because of inaccuracy issue, but it has been used to win long range matches like Wimbledon and is extremely popular for hunting to this day.

However, since good tech support , excellent brass , fantastic fast twist barrels, and good powder are available as well as load data, the 22 Creedmoor will likely be here to stay.

Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-23-2023, 03:21 PM
AB2506's Avatar
AB2506 AB2506 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 2,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnthehat View Post
This sounds like a very interesting little cartridge.

I really don't think that the longer neck is that much of an advantage. If that was the case, the Swift would have kept the 22/250 at bay.
The swift has a longer neck than the Creedmoor by a fair bit as well.

When the 300 magnum came out, it was perceived that the short neck would be its death because of inaccuracy issue, but it has been used to win long range matches like Wimbledon and is extremely popular for hunting to this day.

However, since good tech support , excellent brass , fantastic fast twist barrels, and good powder are available as well as load data, the 22 Creedmoor will likely be here to stay.

Cat
The 22 Creedmoor pretty much equals or slightly exceeds the great 22-250. It has all the advantages of the 22-250AI, reduced case stretch being the most noted advantage of the AI over the regular 22-250. The Creedmoor case is designed with a sharp shoulder and neglible case taper.

If I didn't have a great 22-250, I'd buy the Creedmoor.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-23-2023, 06:58 PM
tikka250's Avatar
tikka250 tikka250 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: East
Posts: 2,093
Default

I have chatted with a friend who shoots both the 22-250 ai and the 22 creed with fast twist barrels and from reports they both are insane accurate at distance and will still stabilize the 55gr pills as well. He's running 6.5 creed brass through a bushing die to form brass and far as I know hasn't had issues.
I had been planning on building an AI but from what I'm seeing the 22creed may happen instead when the time comes to make that decision.
__________________
HOLD ON FUR!

For my coyote pics @trophy_country_coyotes on instagram

life's too short to fish nymphs
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-23-2023, 09:11 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Brass

You dont have to resize brass. Alpha Munitions makes 22 Creed brass. I use Whidden Dies.

https://alphamunitions.com/product-category/brass/

Makes chooseing the Cartridge alot easier.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-24-2023, 09:44 AM
LJalberta LJalberta is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 548
Default

22CM with the 88 ELDs would be a slick unit. I would build one for big game if it were allowed in Alberta.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-24-2023, 05:15 PM
Outcast's Avatar
Outcast Outcast is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cochrane,Alberta
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJalberta View Post
22CM with the 88 ELDs would be a slick unit. I would build one for big game if it were allowed in Alberta.
X2
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-27-2023, 02:01 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,490
Default Antelope

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJalberta View Post
22CM with the 88 ELDs would be a slick unit. I would build one for big game if it were allowed in Alberta.
I think they would work well on Antelope. Probably work well on a White Tail Doe too.

I hope to test them on Coyotes before the winter is done.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-27-2023, 10:10 PM
fps plus fps plus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg View Post
I think they would work well on Antelope. Probably work well on a White Tail Doe too.

I hope to test them on Coyotes before the winter is done.
22 Creedmore probably would work but not legal in for big game in Alberta
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-27-2023, 10:25 PM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markg View Post
You dont have to resize brass. Alpha Munitions makes 22 Creed brass. I use Whidden Dies.

https://alphamunitions.com/product-category/brass/

Makes chooseing the Cartridge alot easier.
I have also seen Peterson 22 Creedmoor brass available in both large and small primer pockets.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.