Go Back   Alberta Outdoors Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 01-12-2022, 11:53 PM
obsessed1 obsessed1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,995
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
This is a whole different topic
Except that the reasons given for caliber choice is based on this....at least that's what is being argued about in this thread. We have guides in Africa choice calibers, G bear guide calibers, elk at 400yds ect...issues that the vast majority of hunters never have.. so choosing a caliber need based off these for the average guy is kinda silly

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 01-13-2022, 12:39 AM
Faststeel Faststeel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
What to me always get missed in lighter, lower recoil discussions is 250-3000, 257 Roberts, 300 Savage, 6.5x55, 32 Special, 30-30, 25-40 and a host of really effective rounds that have very low recoil while still producing great results on game. 95% of game is shot under 200 yards, by new hunters or experienced ones. A larger diameter bullet moving a little slower is no real handicap out to 250 yards. It isn't like the trajectory changes all that much and being under 8 lbs of recoil has very large benefits.
Couldn't agree more Dean , but finding a 250 savage, or a 257 Bob can be rather challenging
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 01-13-2022, 01:44 AM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by obsessed1 View Post
Except that the reasons given for caliber choice is based on this....at least that's what is being argued about in this thread. We have guides in Africa choice calibers, G bear guide calibers, elk at 400yds ect...issues that the vast majority of hunters never have.. so choosing a caliber need based off these for the average guy is kinda silly

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
I thought the original question was why do people think that they need a larger caliber rifle. When we start new hunters off with a lighter recoiling, smaller diameter which is deemed adequate?

Pretty simple
Like it or not you get higher performance
If you want it or need it, that’s up to you
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 03-26-2022, 07:30 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by obsessed1 View Post
As a side note....what percentage of hunters ever go on a guided dangerous game hunt? I'd bet it's a small percentage. Again what percent of hunters hunt in a place where actual chance of encountering a dangerous game animal while hunting? There's an argument for large calibers...moose, elk, g bears ect but again such a small percentage of hunters actually hunt these game species compared to the millions of deer hunters

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
I think you nailed it. The largest percentage of BG hunters in N A are shooting Deer. Thats why any conversation of this type is usually biased to the smaller sized Big Game, and thus to the smaller calibers. There is certainly no doubt that they are right.

Change the geography and species a bit and I think you would see a big change in the conversation... but always with the usual few exceptions .
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.