Go Back   Alberta Outdoors Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 11-17-2024, 10:52 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo View Post
No, it is only illegal in wmus that don't start with a 4.


TJ Schwanky deserves a plaque for getting this started.

Its time to expand the law to allow dogs to accompany, but not chase, in ALL wmus.

Hello wonderful minister for outfitters?
I was specifically talking about tracking wounded game with dogs or using dogs to find downed game, not accompanying hunters during the hunt or using them as pack dogs.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 11-18-2024, 01:22 AM
walking buffalo's Avatar
walking buffalo walking buffalo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerfan View Post
That little “and” in there is important to. What you are advising doing is following after, on the trail of or searching for the animal, which is specifically mentioned in the portion I posted and not a part of the exemption criteria you did.

You're trying too hard....

By law, Without a weapon and without intend to kill, you are not "Hunting".
If you find the dead deer, take a photo.
Then come back without the dogs and tag it.

If you are not hunting, there is no law I am aware of making it illegal to have a dog under control being allowed to scent track a big game animal.

Remember, the "hunting" definition is notoriously "loose".
See the multitude of previous discussions on the topic of the legal definition of "hunting".




This law is outdated.
It was one of Albert's very first big game laws.
The sole intent was to abolish the use of catch hounds (wolf hounds) before causing the extirpation of our few remaining deer, elk and antelope.

Those days are past.

Keep it illegal to allow dogs to chase big game, whether while hunting or not.
Allow for the use of dogs under control or on a leash to scent track wounded big game for the purpose of retrieval and the prevention of "waste".
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -

"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 11-18-2024, 05:28 AM
rugerfan rugerfan is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo View Post
You're trying too hard....

By law, Without a weapon and without intend to kill, you are not "Hunting".
If you find the dead deer, take a photo.
Then come back without the dogs and tag it.

If you are not hunting, there is no law I am aware of making it illegal to have a dog under control being allowed to scent track a big game animal.

Remember, the "hunting" definition is notoriously "loose".
See the multitude of previous discussions on the topic of the legal definition of "hunting".




This law is outdated.
It was one of Albert's very first big game laws.
The sole intent was to abolish the use of catch hounds (wolf hounds) before causing the extirpation of our few remaining deer, elk and antelope.

Those days are past.

Keep it illegal to allow dogs to chase big game, whether while hunting or not.
Allow for the use of dogs under control or on a leash to scent track wounded big game for the purpose of retrieval and the prevention of "waste".
Tell you what, next time you decide to do this why don’t you invite your local conservation officer out to join you and see how it goes. I’m no lawyer, but I can read and trailing deer with a dog is illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 11-18-2024, 05:46 AM
Sundog57 Sundog57 is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Default

As one of my friends always says:
Anytime you think that you're within the boundary of the law, think of your intended excuse, for example:
"I wasn't actually hunting"
and then mentally add the words 'Your Honour" to the sentence

Does it sound convincing?
__________________
Why hunt when I could buy meat?
Why have sex when I could opt for artificial insemination?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.