Go Back   Alberta Outdoors Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-05-2023, 02:15 AM
FredF2 FredF2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 15
Default Alberta hikes crop insurance premiums 60%

https://globalnews.ca/news/9527563/a...miums-farmers/

Really surprising to see considering farmers are a very important demographic to them and being its just before a closely called election... what are they thinking?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2023, 08:58 AM
Rvsask Rvsask is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 558
Default

I think they’re thinking that important demographic doesn’t pay attention to things like that if they point fingers at Trudeau. That is for a fact how it works here in Saskatchewan anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-05-2023, 09:21 AM
Armorman's Avatar
Armorman Armorman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rural NE Alberta
Posts: 344
Default

If my coverage has increased to match it's only reasonable to expect that the premium does as well. Anyway, I'm going to wait until I see how my insurance package compares to last year before I say anything either way.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-05-2023, 09:48 AM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,796
Default

The government has no business insuring privately owned assets of any type.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2023, 09:54 AM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 4,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
The government has no business insuring privately owned assets of any type.
That's one point of view, but farming is a particular risky and vital endeavor, failure of that sector would be catastrophic for the rest of us.

Grizz
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2023, 10:46 AM
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,953
Default

Claims

Like most insurance, it has an effect.

My son had to stop his snow removal for that reason. 700% increase on premiums. Yes. 700%.

Cooperators insurance wont even cover for snow removal anymore. They suggest a broker. Claims went from 2.3 billion to 5.8

Of course, payouts are part of the problem but it is cheaper than an investigation and legal battle.

I think 2022 was likely the most expensive input costs for farming ever per acre. This year doesnt look better.
__________________
When you are born, you get a ticket to the Freak Show.
If you are born in Canada, you get a front row seat.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2023, 11:03 AM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,098
Default

This makes no sense to me. Insurance is set pay out per acre. Has nothing to do with commodity prices. So, higher payout, higher premium. Unless it's been mismanaged for years and they need to make up....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2023, 11:35 AM
esher esher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Grande prairie, alberta
Posts: 546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
This makes no sense to me. Insurance is set pay out per acre. Has nothing to do with commodity prices. So, higher payout, higher premium. Unless it's been mismanaged for years and they need to make up....
Not how it works, its like 30 bushels per acre x price =total per acre. Price and or yield change so does total.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2023, 11:37 AM
Goncutn Goncutn is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
This makes no sense to me. Insurance is set pay out per acre. Has nothing to do with commodity prices. So, higher payout, higher premium. Unless it's been mismanaged for years and they need to make up....
Actually the premium is tied to the commodity price (averaged yearly) and then factored with the producers proven production. The price of the commodity multiplied by the producers proven yield. Every producer will have different premiums as per coverage offered, plus there is a multitude of different coverage level to work with, not a cut and dry as one thinks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2023, 11:54 AM
jungleboy's Avatar
jungleboy jungleboy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 7,030
Default

Insurance companies. I have often said they are at the top of the food chain when it comes screwing over their customers. I have more faith in Trudeau than I do insurance companies.

They can hike their rates by 100% , it doesn’t increase your chances of a fair payout or any payout for that matter when you put a claim in
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-05-2023, 12:15 PM
hillbillyreefer's Avatar
hillbillyreefer hillbillyreefer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,674
Default

This is the most concise summary I’ve found about the premium increase in Alberta. I shamelessly stole it from @skellerfarms on twitter.

Lots of posts about crop insurance increases. Remember to do the math properly by factoring in the increased coverage.

2022: $24/ac buys $600/ac coverage
2023: $36/ac buys $800/ac coverage

24/600= 4%
36/800= 4.5%
(4.5-4)/4= 12.5% increase

This is not a 50% increase (36-24)/24

Oh and the dippers in the article claiming crop in insurance is the biggest expense in cropping is laughable. It shows just how misinformed the NDP agriculture critic is with actual agriculture.
__________________
Upset a Lefty, Fly a Drone!

"I find it interesting that some folk will pay to use a range, use a golf course, use a garage bay but think landowners should have to give permission for free. Do these same people think hookers should be treated like landowners?" pitw
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-05-2023, 12:45 PM
raab raab is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillbillyreefer View Post
This is the most concise summary I’ve found about the premium increase in Alberta. I shamelessly stole it from @skellerfarms on twitter.

Lots of posts about crop insurance increases. Remember to do the math properly by factoring in the increased coverage.

2022: $24/ac buys $600/ac coverage
2023: $36/ac buys $800/ac coverage

24/600= 4%
36/800= 4.5%
(4.5-4)/4= 12.5% increase

This is not a 50% increase (36-24)/24

Oh and the dippers in the article claiming crop in insurance is the biggest expense in cropping is laughable. It shows just how misinformed the NDP agriculture critic is with actual agriculture.
To be fair the NDP do not believe in fertilizing with their climate agenda. Which is ironic because every time they open their mouth it seems to be all they spew.
__________________
“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-05-2023, 12:49 PM
riden riden is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jungleboy View Post
Insurance companies. I have often said they are at the top of the food chain when it comes screwing over their customers. I have more faith in Trudeau than I do insurance companies.

They can hike their rates by 100% , it doesn’t increase your chances of a fair payout or any payout for that matter when you put a claim in
Someone can chime in and add if they want.

Only the gubbermint sells crop insurance. AFSC (provincial crown corp) sells it. Does anyone know if FCC sells crop insurance?

Quite certain roughly half the cost is subsidized between the province and the Feds.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-05-2023, 12:49 PM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 4,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jungleboy View Post
Insurance companies. I have often said they are at the top of the food chain when it comes screwing over their customers. I have more faith in Trudeau than I do insurance companies.

They can hike their rates by 100% , it doesn’t increase your chances of a fair payout or any payout for that matter when you put a claim in
https://regina.ctvnews.ca/lawyer-off...nial-1.6296587

Grizz
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-05-2023, 12:57 PM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riden View Post
Only the gubbermint sells crop insurance.
I don't believe that's correct.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-05-2023, 01:28 PM
urban rednek's Avatar
urban rednek urban rednek is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillbillyreefer View Post
This is the most concise summary I’ve found about the premium increase in Alberta. I shamelessly stole it from @skellerfarms on twitter.

Lots of posts about crop insurance increases. Remember to do the math properly by factoring in the increased coverage.

2022: $24/ac buys $600/ac coverage
2023: $36/ac buys $800/ac coverage

24/600= 4%
36/800= 4.5%
(4.5-4)/4= 12.5% increase

This is not a 50% increase (36-24)/24

Oh and the dippers in the article claiming crop in insurance is the biggest expense in cropping is laughable. It shows just how misinformed the NDP agriculture critic is with actual agriculture.
I see what you are saying.
That's the kind of math that financial advisors and retail businesses (especially sales managers at car dealerships) love to foist on an unsuspecting consumer.
A 50% increase out of pocket is still out of pocket, no matter how you try to spin it.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.” - Thomas Sowell

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”- Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-05-2023, 01:43 PM
gman1978 gman1978 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillbillyreefer View Post
This is the most concise summary I’ve found about the premium increase in Alberta. I shamelessly stole it from @skellerfarms on twitter.

Lots of posts about crop insurance increases. Remember to do the math properly by factoring in the increased coverage.

2022: $24/ac buys $600/ac coverage
2023: $36/ac buys $800/ac coverage

24/600= 4%
36/800= 4.5%
(4.5-4)/4= 12.5% increase

This is not a 50% increase (36-24)/24

Oh and the dippers in the article claiming crop in insurance is the biggest expense in cropping is laughable. It shows just how misinformed the NDP agriculture critic is with actual agriculture.
This is a pretty accurate post on how it work. Canola at 20 bucks per bushel is going to cost you more than canola at 13 bucks a bushel. That’s pretty simple math. The dippers comment on the most expensive input shows how much they really know or care. Just playing politics trying to get a farmer vote.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-05-2023, 02:36 PM
saskbooknut saskbooknut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,610
Default

Crop insurance is a Federal/Provincial subsidized risk management insurance.
Farmers do not pay the full cost of crop insurance.
If it were a private insurance company, the rates would be much higher.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-05-2023, 08:15 PM
Dr. Phil A Dr. Phil A is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,006
Default

You can lower your coverage to 60% and still take the hail rider to the max. If you live in hail alley in central Alberta this usually makes up most of the claims. Very rarely are the crops pounded 100% and there is some salvage value. You can take additional coverage thru a straight line company. These guys are usually have a limited number of policies they will sell in any given area.

Most producers were given an individual worksheet showing what they had paid into the program and what they had received for a period of ten plus years. Most of them had come out ahead. My clients always wanted enough payout to cover the premiums at least.

Crop insurance has paid out more than they have taken in over the years. Saskatchewan ran into this problem as well. Enter in the re-insurers (money guys)that will cover the shortfall. These guys need to see some return on their cash especially when the weather continues to take its toll.

One year there was a hail storm go thru in early July, not 100% and the hail paid out. The barley recovered and we had a long fall with no frost. Crops were coming off in good shape around 70 bushel per acre. Barley prices hit $5.50 per bushel making it a very lucrative crop that year. Payout should have waited until the crop was off and bins measured. Kinda of like getting a vehicle payout prior to an adjuster looking at your car.

Insurance is a small cost in comparison to the inputs.
__________________
The problem with following the masses is that the M is silent...

In order to be a smart azz, you have to be smart otherwise you are just an azz.

You're offended.... I think it is funny and that is why I am happier than you.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-05-2023, 08:27 PM
Dr. Phil A Dr. Phil A is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,006
Default

Going on to the website, I find it interesting there was no mention of the 20% premium reduction in 2021 due to a surplus in the reserve. The reserve depleted in 2022 requiring the 20% to be dropped.

Also offered is the fall price insurance. This is basically hedging. Farmers look at the price in the spring and make an educated estimation as to where the price will be in the fall. If they figure the price will be lower that the spring price the can take this insurance. This is an extra insurance outside the crop insurance (perils) premium.
__________________
The problem with following the masses is that the M is silent...

In order to be a smart azz, you have to be smart otherwise you are just an azz.

You're offended.... I think it is funny and that is why I am happier than you.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-05-2023, 08:35 PM
IL Bar IL Bar is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Phil A View Post
Going on to the website, I find it interesting there was no mention of the 20% premium reduction in 2021 due to a surplus in the reserve. The reserve depleted in 2022 requiring the 20% to be dropped.

Also offered is the fall price insurance. This is basically hedging. Farmers look at the price in the spring and make an educated estimation as to where the price will be in the fall. If they figure the price will be lower that the spring price the can take this insurance. This is an extra insurance outside the crop insurance (perils) premium.
The price insurance was called the spring price endorsement. It was cancelled a couple years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-05-2023, 08:57 PM
Dr. Phil A Dr. Phil A is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IL Bar View Post
The price insurance was called the spring price endorsement. It was cancelled a couple years ago.
I know they removed it at one point. Just looked at AFSC website and it is back called the Fall Price insurance. I would venture an educated guess that it looks more like the cattle price insurance model than the original Spring Price Endorsement. Grain producers liked the look of the cattle price insurance when it originally rolled out.

Pigs and paint.
__________________
The problem with following the masses is that the M is silent...

In order to be a smart azz, you have to be smart otherwise you are just an azz.

You're offended.... I think it is funny and that is why I am happier than you.

Last edited by Dr. Phil A; 03-05-2023 at 09:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-05-2023, 09:07 PM
saskbooknut saskbooknut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,610
Default

2021/2022 Saskatchewan Crop insurance - worst year ever
Premiums 272 Million
Sask Gov. 200 Million
Fed Gov. 245 Million

Paid out. 2.55 Billion
There were reinsurance recoveries making the
net loss. 1.46 Billion
If it wasn't a Government program, it would be bankrupt and done.

Here's the Alberta Crop Insurance info -
https://afsc.ca/about-afsc/annual-report/
Provincial and Federal input 2021/22 almost a Billion $
Deficit still over 2 Billion in Alberta

Last edited by saskbooknut; 03-05-2023 at 09:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-05-2023, 10:20 PM
6.5 shooter's Avatar
6.5 shooter 6.5 shooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,512
Default

NDP wants to forum Government they will lie about everything so those who care not to look up the facts will vote for them. At present that seems to be about 50% of the population of Alberta. We are screwed if they get in. Happy socks and his side kicks Singalong and Nutbar will lead us down the path of social ruin.... Mark my words. They will be the destroyers of Canada.
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.