Go Back   Alberta Outdoors Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2020, 03:48 PM
Flight01's Avatar
Flight01 Flight01 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 2,515
Default 308 win heavy loads

Anyone ever shoot 200 or 220 grain flat or round nose? I see hornady offers 220grain round nose in the international line. My dad was talking about hunting with 220 soft points back in the 70’s with his rem 700 in 308win. I was thinking of giving it a whirl just to see. They are heavy but not that much longer due to design. Any experience with stabilizing this bullet? Specifically 220 Sierra round nose. I’ll be trying it and I’ll report here with accuracy, velocity and I’ll try to capture a few at 25 yards and 100 yards to see expansion if I were to make this my black bear round.
Again any real world experience? Even info in the 30-06 is welcome.
I know bullet construction and technology has improved but it’s just something I want to try. I’m foreseeing 30-30 trajectories but at higher energy
__________________
Be sure of your target and what lies beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2020, 04:09 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flight01 View Post
Anyone ever shoot 200 or 220 grain flat or round nose? I see hornady offers 220grain round nose in the international line. My dad was talking about hunting with 220 soft points back in the 70’s with his rem 700 in 308win. I was thinking of giving it a whirl just to see. They are heavy but not that much longer due to design. Any experience with stabilizing this bullet? Specifically 220 Sierra round nose. I’ll be trying it and I’ll report here with accuracy, velocity and I’ll try to capture a few at 25 yards and 100 yards to see expansion if I were to make this my black bear round.
Again any real world experience? Even info in the 30-06 is welcome.
I know bullet construction and technology has improved but it’s just something I want to try. I’m foreseeing 30-30 trajectories but at higher energy
I use 220RN in my 30-06. With a .308 Win. you should be able to get a MV of between 25-2600 fps with Ramshot Hunter or H 4350. It makes for a great round with the right rifle and a 24 in. Bbl
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2020, 04:27 PM
Flight01's Avatar
Flight01 Flight01 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 2,515
Default

My 308 is a 22” barrel and with reduced powder capacity compared to the ‘06 I’ll be seating near max OAL and getting 2300 FPS. That’s my goal anyway .
I’m thinking accuracy will be fine but will have to do some expansion tests at 100 yards to make sure I’m keeping velocity high enough to expand somewhat.
Any on game experience?
__________________
Be sure of your target and what lies beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2020, 04:36 PM
Tactical Lever Tactical Lever is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Fox Creek
Posts: 3,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
I use 220RN in my 30-06. With a .308 Win. you should be able to get a MV of between 25-2600 fps with Ramshot Hunter or H 4350. It makes for a great round with the right rifle and a 24 in. Bbl
Sounds a bit hot. Lee data doesn't hit 2400 with 220 or 225 gr. and Hornady data for 200 and 208 is a bit under 2600 and 2500 respectively.

I'd use a 220 RN for heavy game. The .308 rifles I believe all have a fairly fast twist.

Would carry energy a bit better than the lighter 170 gr. bullet from a 30-30.
__________________
Profanity and name calling are poor substitutes for education and logic.

Survivor of the dread covid
Pureblood!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2020, 04:55 PM
obsessed1 obsessed1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,995
Default

Both my 308s have a 1:12. They don't stabilize a 200+ bullet well..a 1:10 like my brothers 783 would work well I'd imagine. Like you said. Slow with somewhat rainbow trajectory ( thinking 16-20" barrel) but should hit pretty hard and penetrate well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2020, 05:04 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactical Lever View Post
Sounds a bit hot. Lee data doesn't hit 2400 with 220 or 225 gr. and Hornady data for 200 and 208 is a bit under 2600 and 2500 respectively.

I'd use a 220 RN for heavy game. The .308 rifles I believe all have a fairly fast twist.

Would carry energy a bit better than the lighter 170 gr. bullet from a 30-30.

Yes it is ... VERY hot. Those were 30-06/220 loads. Sorry. I better learn to edit before posting.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2020, 05:38 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,882
Default

Round nose 220’s require a 1 in 10 twist.
Stubby or round nose 200’s should run fine in a 1 in 12 twist tho.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2020, 07:36 PM
Flight01's Avatar
Flight01 Flight01 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 2,515
Default

I believe this rem 673 is a 1:10.
__________________
Be sure of your target and what lies beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-17-2020, 09:39 AM
Tactical Lever Tactical Lever is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Fox Creek
Posts: 3,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
Yes it is ... VERY hot. Those were 30-06/220 loads. Sorry. I better learn to edit before posting.
Lol! Well you wouldn't be the first! I responded to a hunting post several years back, and I was pretty darn sure, because the other option seemed silly. As soon as I posted it, I thought that I had better make sure. Got back a few minutes later to correct myself, and someone had already taken me to task for it!
__________________
Profanity and name calling are poor substitutes for education and logic.

Survivor of the dread covid
Pureblood!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-17-2020, 10:31 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,848
Default

There is no advantage to heavy for calibre bullets. On top of that, round nose do not buck brush any better than spire points, the loss of launch velocity and the effect on velocity of the RN means trajectory, wind deflection, expansion and possibly penetration etc are all negatively impacted. A 200 or 220 will not kill game any better than a 165 or 180 grain. I don't see the point in making a 200 yard gun out of something that is entirely competent to 800 yards with the right bullets. If you want to shoot 220 grain bullets I would move up to the 338-06 because even the 338 Federal is better off with 200 grain or lighter bullets and performs best with 180s. Other option is the 35 Whelen. In my view, the only reason for RN bullets today is for use in tubular magazines or to get a wider metplat for shooting dangerous game at 50 yards or less.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.